Never forget that; all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
--- Edmund Burke
http://www.policyexperts.org/experts/
Great site for lunacy of fluoride: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/water.htm
"Fluoride was the key chemical in atomic bomb production, according to the documents. Massive quantities of fluoride-- millions of tons-- were essential for the manufacture of bomb-grade uranium and plutonium for nuclear weapons throughout the Cold War. One of the most toxic chemicals known, fluoride rapidly emerged as the leading chemical health hazard of the U.S atomic bomb program--both for workers and for nearby communities, the documents reveal." http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/fluoride.htm
LEADING EDGE INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH GROUP GENERAL PUBLICATIONS CATALOG
The Analytical Chronology of Fluoridation: Politics vs. Science
Authored by Val Valerian,189 pages, 8 1/2 by 11 Velo Bound, Leading Edge Research Group, 1997.
A 70,000-word white paper and research tool, with more than 850 entries, master index, and reference bibliography. The Analytical Chronology of Fluoridation is the result of the examination of thousands of letters, monographs, scientific documents and declassified materials from the National Archives. Through the use of these materials it goes on to prove, by definition, that the fluoridation paradigm is a civil conspiracy participated in by agencies all the way from the US Public Health Service, the World Health Organization, the AMA and ADA, and all state health departments, and that the fluoridation paradigm is based on false science, misrepresentation and deliberate falsehood in order to provide a means for dumping hazardous wastes from industry into the food and water without challenge from the population. This 189 page, 70,000 word piece of work took hundreds of hours to compile and analyze, and is backed up by numerous references and a superb index for locating those hard-to-find statements by the AMA and ADA who, before 1945, told the scientific truth about the nature of fluorides, chemicals more toxic than lead and arsenic.
Contrary to what the population is told, fluorides produce rapid aging, cause brittle bones and interfere with virtually every enzymatic process in the body. Dentists tell people that "fluorides prevent cavities", yet statistical analysis of all the major fluoridation studies upon which this premise is based demonstrates these studies to be fraudulent. Together with legitimate studies done independently which show both greater dental decay rates, higher dentist ratios and higher dentist incomes in fluoridated areas, right from the ADA and AMA’s own publications, there can be no doubt that the public is being taken for one of the biggest "rides" of the century. According to Senior EPA Scientist Robert Carton, "fluoridation may well represent the biggest case of fraud in this century". Trace the statements of major players in this drama from the early times to the present, and peek into secret closed sessions of state and territorial dental directors in the 1950’s where they admit that fluorides are systemic poisons.
Comparing the statements, actions and activities of these "health professionals" with definitions from Blacks Law Dictionary on "conspiracy", especially civil conspiracy, it can be readily seen that the whole paradigm has been an ongoing conspiracy, where 144 million people in the United States alone are exposed to these EPA-certified hazardous wastes deliberately and arrogantly dumped into the food, water and air. Furthermore, these compounds are known to affect human reproduction, fertility, mortality, intelligence and health. If fluorides in fact do cause cavities and dental problems in humans after 5 years of age, and they really don’t produce the effects we are told, and, considering the effect on the human hippocampus, where all memories are coordinated and behavioral decisions are sculpted, it makes sense why at least one concentration camp run by I.G. Farben had fluoridated the water. Knowing there was no dental plan for Nazi prisoners, there must have been another reason.
There seems to be some evidence that both the Germans and the Soviets fluoridated the water of prisons and concentration camps in order to keep the confined population docile. Fluorides are used for this purpose in animal breeding, where intractable bulls are administered fluorides to calm them down. The "Analytical Chronology" is larger and more comprehensive than anything available on the Internet, or anywhere else. If you are interested in the fluoridation paradigm and what it is doing, and want to have a definitive guideline and a comprehensive view of activity in order to assist you to evaluate current and future activity, this work is invaluable. $26 postpaid (USA) $36 postpaid (Canada, Mexico), $43 Postpaid (Other). Send to Leading Edge Research Group, P.O. Box 2370, Yelm, Washington 98597. Prices cover printing, binding, packaging and mailing costs. USA Bookrate paid. Foreign: Airmail Paid. All payment in US Dollars. No Eurocheques Please. Send to: Leading Edge International Research Group, P.O. Box 2370, Yelm, Washington 98597 USA
Take a look at Reader Comments on the Analytical Chronology of Fluoridation, including those by medical and scientific readers:
“Thank you for kindly sending me your Analytical Chronology of Fluoridation: Politics vs. Science. Considering the enormous amount of material that surrounds this subject, you have really done a remarkable job!" -- Albert W. Burgstahler, Ph.D. (Harvard), University of Kansas, Professor of Organic Chemistry, January 31, 1998, author, "Fluoridation: The Great Dilemma", Coronado Press, 1978, past co-editor of the scientific journal Fluoride, and former president of the International Society for Fluoride Research.
"The Analytical Chronology of Fluoridation tells the bizarre story of fluoridation from its earliest beginnings to the time of publication. There is no concealment of the bias of the author - the opposing of fluoridation and those who promote the process. Its forte is the documentation of the ruthlessness of the promoters of fluoridation and the possible motives behind the movement. It documents the use of U.S. taxpayers' dollars to subvert individuals and institutions to promote fluoridation not only in the United States and Canada, but also overseas. It also presents, in abridged form, the evidence that fluoridation does not improve oral health but is associated with appreciable harm. The index and extensive bibliography provides a unique resource. It is must reading for those who may come face-to-face with the powerful elite to continue to wage a war on behalf of fluoridation." -- (June 1998) Richard A Foulkes, M.D., former Executive Director of the Royal Columbian Hospital in New Westminster, B.C., Medical Officer with the Royal Canadian Air Force, and Assistant Professor in the University of British Columbia Department of Health Care and Epidemiology. Dr, Foulkes has published numerous papers in medical journals, trade magazines and news papers dealing with health issues. Journals include: Canadian Medical Association Journal; Journal of the American Medical Association; Journal of American Hospital Association; American Journal of Mental Deficiency; and, Medical Services Journal, Canada . He was "Contributing Editor" for Canadian Doctor, 1967-1973. His most recent contributions related to fluoride have been published in the journal of the International Society for Fluoride Research, Fluoride.
http://www.trufax.org/catalog/fluoro.html
Table 2. Fluoride Concentrations of Foods & Beverages
http://commongroundmag.com/2005/04/wh_lead0504.html
Product # of samples MeanConcentration Range of Concentrations Reference
Artificially Fluoridated Water -- 1.0 ppm 0.6-1.2 ppm
Juice
43 1.03 ppm 0.15-6.8 ppm Stannard 1991
Grape juice 9 2.4 ppm 1.16-6.8 ppm Stannard 1991
Juice
532 0.56 ppm 0.02-2.80 ppm Kiritsy 1996
White grape juice 10 1.45 ppm 0.15-2.80 ppm Kiritsy 1996
Juice 24 0.69 ppm 0.16-1.08 Turner 1998
Soda 12 0.78 ppm 0.68 - 0.91 ppm Turner 1998
Soda 105 0.74 ppm 0.07-1.37 ppm Pang 1992
Soda 332 0.72 ppm 0.02-1.28 ppm Heilman 1999
Coca-Cola 79 0.70 ppm 0.02-1.10 ppm Heilman 1999
Dr. Pepper 47 1.02 ppm 0.70-1.28 ppm Heilman 1999
Pepsi Cola 104 0.60 ppm 0.02-1.22 ppm Heilman 1999
Gatorade 13 0.85 ppm 0.02-1.04 ppm Pang 1992
Gatorade 1 1.08 ppm -- Turner 1998
Wine 19 1.02 ppm 0.23-2.8 ppm Burgstahler 1997
Wine -- -- 0.1 - >12 ppm California State University, 1990-1994
Tea (brewed w/ NF water) 26 2.56 ppm 0.61-6.68 ppm Pang 1992
Tea (brewed w/ NF water) -- 3 ppm 0.1-4.2 ppm Levy 1999
Fluoridated Salt* 200-250 ppm -- Marthaler 2000
Cereals (processed w/fluoridated water) -- -- 3.8 - 6.3 ppm Warren 2003
Fish -- 2.1 ppm -- Dabeka 1995 (cited in ATSDR 2001)
Canned Fish -- 4.57 ppm -- Dabeka 1995 (cited in ATSDR 2001)
Chicken infant foods 6 4.4 ppm 1.05-8.38 ppm Heilman 1997
Pureed Chicken baby food (w/ mechancially deboned chicken) -- 4.2 ppm 1.89-8.63 ppm Fein 2001
Chicken sticks (w/ mechancially deboned chicken) -- 3.61 ppm 1.61-6.0 ppm Fein 2001
Luncheon meat (w/ mechancially deboned chicken) -- 1.98 ppm 1.01-3.65 ppm Fein 2001
Dry cereals produced w/ fluoridated water -- -- 4-6 ppm Fomon 2000
Powdered Infant Formula (made w/ fluoridated water) -- 0.97 ppm -- Fomon 2000
Breast milk -- 0.005-0.01 ppm Fomon 2000
* The use of fluoridated salt is becoming increasingly widespread across the globe. While the US & Canada do not yet have salt fluoridation programs, it is currently estimated that more people in the world are exposed to fluoridated salt than fluoridated water. Thus, this source of fluoride exposure is becoming increasingly important and insidious. Fluoridated salt usually contains about 250 ppm fluoride, which would result in a daily intake of 2.5 mg of fluoride per day for people consuming 10 grams of salt. Countries with extensive salt fluoridation programs include: Austria, Bolivia, Columbia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, France, Germany, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Switzerland, and Venezuela.
________________________________________
References:
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (2001). Toxicological Profile for Fluorides: Draft Profile for Public Comment. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Public Health Service.
Index of Fluorinated Pharmaceuticals http://www.slweb.org/ftrcfluorinatedpharm.html
Anesthetics (general) Anti-fungal antibiotics Appetite suppressants Antacids Antihistamines Arthritis (rheumatoid) Anti-anxiety Antilipemics (cholesterol lowering) Psychotropic (anti-psychotics) Antibiotics (Fluoroquinolones) Anti-malarial Steroids/anti-inflammatory agents Antidepressants Antimetabolites (chemotherapy)
Cipro - The controversial anthrax drug, Cipro is also a fluorinated drug. For an in depth look at this try this link:
http://www.penweb.org/fluoride/ciproinfo.html
Part 3 - Chemicals/Drugs containing Fluorine Compounds
HF (hydrogen fluoride or hydrofluoric acid)
Today hundreds of industrial and manufacturing processes use hydrofluoric acid, much of which escapes in gas form into the atmosphere as pollution. It is the 6th most emitted air pollutant in the US. Some of the suspected medical indications from exposure include the following:
• Cardiovascular or Blood Toxicant
• Developmental Toxicant
• Gastrointestinal or Liver Toxicant
• Musculoskeletal Toxicant
• Neurotoxicant
• Reproductive Toxicant
• Respiratory Toxicant
• Skin or Sense Organ Toxicant
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/fluoride.htm
Bromethalin • Fluoroacetamide • 1,3-Difluoro-2-propanol (Gliftor) • Sodium fluoroacetate
http://www.fluoridealert.org/pesticides/gliftor.abstracts.htm
Cryolite- Cryolite is an uncommon mineral of very limited natural distribution. Mostly considered a one locallity mineral, for although there are a few other minor locallities, it was only found in large quantities on the west coast of Greenland.
It was used as a solvent of the aluminum rich ore, bauxite, which is a combination of aluminum oxides such as gibbsite, boehmite and diaspore. It is very difficult to remove atoms of aluminum from atoms of oxygen which is necessary in order to produce aluminum metal. Cryolite made an excellent flux to make the process less expensive. Now it is too rare to be used for this purpose and sodium aluminum fluoride is produced artificially to fill the void.
http://www.galleries.com/Minerals/HALIDES/cryolite/cryolite.htm
Top 50 Crops and Sites for for Cryolite use in California in 2007
Crop or Site
(Commodity Code) Gross
Pounds
Application Rate
pounds per acre treated Acres Planted
where all or part
has been sprayed Acres Treated
Application
Count
All Sites (00)
679,594 6.49 92,769 104,651 2,618
Table and Raisin Grapes (29141)
479,998 5.65 71,531 84,893 2,085
Oranges (2006)
80,357 12.8 7,086 6,287 127
Bell Peppers (11003)
51,978 8.75 5,359 5,942 172
Wine Grapes (29143)
28,691 5.11 6,497 5,614 152
Kiwis (6018)
28,683 33.5 790.0 855.0 10
Tangerines (2008)
2,847 11.0 259.0 258.6 9
Pumpkins (10011)
1,591 8.51 178.9 186.9 4
Watermelons (10008)
1,430 10.1 169.0 142.0 4
Chili Peppers (8050)
1,187 11.5 54.0 103.0 2
Outdoor Container Nursery (154)
1,090 8.21 269.5 130.4 19
Grapefruit (2002)
509.8 5.86 90.0 87.0 5
Peaches (5004)
432.0 9.60 45.0 45.0 1
Cabbage (13007)
374.0 8.76 380.0 42.7 2
Lemons (2004)
229.6 7.95 16.5 28.9 21
Tangelos (2007)
151.2 10.8 14.0 14.0 2
Outdoor Flower Nursery (152)
40.3 1.92 30.0 21.0 1
Regulatory (100)
2.94 - - - 1
Landscape (30)
1.42 - - - 1
Regional Use for Cryolite on All Sites in 2007
Region
(County Code) Gross
Pounds
Application
Rate
pounds per acre treated Acres Planted
where all or part
has been sprayed Acres Treated
Application
Count
California (00)
679,594 6.49 92,769 104,651 2,618
Fresno (10)
291,319 5.39 45,260 54,094 1,467
Kern (15)
148,514 8.26 18,459 17,988 357
Tulare (54)
87,281 8.24 11,000 10,590 345
Madera (20)
80,675 6.22 9,184 12,977 208
Ventura (56)
27,288 8.77 3,576 3,112 101
Kings (16)
24,305 7.27 1,862 3,344 52
Riverside (33)
11,080 10.8 799.5 1,024 25
Yolo (57)
5,511 5.22 1,133 1,056 26
San Joaquin (39)
2,332 8.80 272.0 264.9 5
Santa Barbara (42)
662.4 8.83 390.0 75.0 5
Lake (17)
345.6 5.24 120.0 66.0 1
San Diego (37)
237.6 6.63 142.4 35.4 23
San Luis Obispo (40)
23.0 0.94 552.0 24.4 1
Santa Cruz (44)
20.0 - 19.5 - 1
Los Angeles (19)
1.42 - - - 1
Working with the Information on this Page
* Complete 2001 data for Kern county was never submitted by the Kern County Agricultural Commissioners office. This missing data includes approximately 32,000 records totaling roughly 10 million pounds. An omission of this scale will significantly impact statewide trends.
** The 2005 data for Ventura county is incomplete because not all of the data was available at the time of DPR's release. Missing data includes mostly applications made in November and December. An estimate based on reported use in Ventura County during November and December from 2002 to 2004 suggests that the 2005 total pounds is underreported by approximately 500,000 pounds. The active ingredients most affected are captan and petroleum oil. See the DPR's 2005 PUR report for additional details.
NOTE! See methodology and documentation for California Pesticide Use Reporting for important qualifications on these numbers.
Click on the commodities name links for special caveats on the data for each commodity. For more detailed use information, including data for other years, search our California Pesticide Use database. Original source for all pesticide use data is the California Pesticide Use Report (PUR) dataset, collected and managed by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Significant processing of the original dataset is required to generate the summary data presented here; see documentation for a full discussion of data handling.
NOTE! Comments on the accuracy of Acres Planted reflect PAN's analysis of acreage data from the California Agricultural Statistics Service (CASS) and Department of Pesticide Regulation Pesticide Use Reporting data. The method used to assess acreage accuracy is described in the documentation. Accuracy was evaluated for aggregate, statewide California acreage, but not for smaller regions (e.g., counties). See CASS acreage estimates for additional information.
Click on underlined terms for definitions or go to the Pesticide Tutorial overview page.
Any underlined term with a book icon has additional information.
To print this page, choose Print. To export this data, choose Save As 'HTML Source' and open it in Excel or equivalent program.
Definitions
• Acres Planted is the planted acreage of the crop in the selected region where the selected chemical was applied. This figure may not be the total acreage of the selected crop. To obtain the total planted acreage for a crop or county, see the crop and county pages available from the Pesticide Use Search Page. See documentation for important distinctions between acres treated and acres planted.
• Acres Treated is the acreage of the crop actually treated with the pesticide. Gross Pounds applied divided by Acres Treated is the application rate of the pesticide. The difference between Acres Planted and Acres Treated is best explained through an example:If a farmer has a 100-acre field and sprays 50 acres, then the Acres Planted will be 100 and the Acres Treated will be 50. If a farmer sprays 50 of their 100 acres three times, then the Acres Planted will remain at 100 acres, but now the value of Acres Treated will be 150. This figure may not be the total acreage of the selected crop. See documentation for further distinctions between acres treated and acres planted.
•
Citation: Kegley, S.E., Hill, B.R., Orme S., Choi A.H., PAN Pesticide Database, Pesticide Action Network, North America (San Francisco, CA, 2009), http:www.pesticideinfo.org.
© 2000-2009 Pesticide Action Network, North America. All rights reserved.
Other websites:
http://www.antidepressantsfacts.com/2003-08-Prozac-Paxil-Fluorophenyl.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/contrails.htm
Thanks for reading Please share everything with everyone.
Babcha’s Pearls
Next focus: Aluminum
Take action to stop fluoridation here
ReplyDeletehttp://congress.FluorideAction.Net